Kloppenberg To Waste Taxpayer Dollars on Unnecessary Recount

Crazy Kloppy, wastin’ my money. JSOnline:

JoAnne Kloppenburg certainly had the right to ask for a statewide recount on Wednesday.

But we had hoped that she wouldn’t – and the state would be better off if she hadn’t.

We understand the motivation. The final county-by-county canvassing of the state Supreme Court election revealed that Justice David Prosser won a narrow victory, a reflection of how polarizing the new governor and his policies have become. The heat generated by the controversy over those policies most likely spurred the significant turnout for a spring nonpartisan election and a 7,316-vote win for Prosser – less than 0.5% of the 1.5 million votes cast.

That’s slim, but it’s not likely that a statewide recount will change the outcome. Were it a margin in the hundreds of votes, perhaps, but Kloppenburg has to recognize that it’s not.

The state Government Accountability Board says it is ready for a recount; the board had anticipated that one would be requested. But it is already requesting some $40,000 extra to deal with a possible 16 recall elections anticipated as a result of some senators leaving the state to avoid a vote on Gov. Scott Walker’s collective bargaining proposals and other senators voting for them.

Earlier, the GAB said a statewide recount in the Supreme Court race might cost as much as $1 million. Given that the state is already scrambling in its current budget to make ends meet and that the next budget won’t be any prettier, this is an expense the state can ill afford.

More here.

Related Posts:

  • Sally

    If the new Governor hadn’t given away his surplus in tax breaks to the corporations who elected him, there wouldn’t be a problem. Maybe they could return the money and save some jobs. If Wisconsin didn’t let some woman count votes on her HOME COMPUTER, Prosser would have lost. Funny how she missed the memo about how MANY votes she was supposed to have ‘found’ to make a recount impossible. Frankly, there are a lot of us who would donate to this cause…do you not want the person who won in office? Oh, wait, this is the group that thought that the SC awarding the Presidency to Bush was fine, and that irregularities in Ohio in 2004 were also OK. As long as the Republican takes control. I suspect you’ll be singing a different tune when they take over YOUR town and throw out contracts and fire people because the Governor decided you were insolvent.

  • http://barbaricthoughts.com/ Kelsey

    Hey, if you want to pony up the money for it, you go right ahead. Be my guest.

    Have you actually watched video of Kloppenberg? The woman was passed over by Obama and other uber-liberals for a reason. There’s a few asteroids missing from that belt.

    Heh. Pretty rich to talk about irregularities with Bush after the 2008 fiasco. Just ask some Hillary supporters.

  • Anonymous

    When the election difference is below one half of one percent, there should be a recount. As for the money the State is spending, look how much Alaska had to spend on Joe Miller’s recount. With election results suddenly showing up the next day after the election, it most definitely should be be recounted and investigated. Kelsey, I don’t know either candidate, but a video of Kioppenberg or the fact that someone else got a position that she didn’t, has absolutely nothing to do with this election.

  • http://barbaricthoughts.com/ Kelsey

    She’d be a disaster on the bench. That’s relevant.

    Joe Miller shouldn’t have pushed it as far as he did. I think by the end of it even his die-hard supporters were like, “Dude, just give it up.”

    And mainstream outlets that don’t have a horse in the race and might even favor Kloppenberg admit that the mistake made was just that, a mistake. The votes are legitimate. Go ahead and waste the money on a recount. It won’t change the outcome.

  • Anonymous

    As far as her being a disaster in the court, I have not heard of any cotroversial rulings she has made that would convines me she is not qualifed. There may be some rulings some feel she blew, but we were not in the court room hearing all the testimony and facts that has influences on the final ruling. As far as the ‘lost votes’ being valid, I have not heard of any judge who has yet made that ruling. But, I am not saying the votes or not. Hopefully they will not extend this ruling out as long as they extended Bush’s and Millers.

© 2013 Barbaric Thoughts. All rights reserved. Site Admin · Entries RSS · Comments RSS
Powered by WordPress · Designed by Theme Junkie